Genetic and/or antibody testing is completely unreliable due to the fact that the epgenetics (outside the genetics) or the interstitial fluids of the Interstitium that surrounds every cell in the human body is controlling the biological expression of all cellular genetics.
When you focus on the genetics and not the interstitial fluid environment of the genetics you end up with a fake paradigm, called the germ theory and a meaningless positive or negative HIV/SARS/EBOLA/ZIKA/COVid-19 diagnosis.
In other words, gene’s do NOT control the genesis of health or disease or a human destiny – YOU do this with what you eat, what you drink, what you breathe, what you think, what you feel and what you believe. This is what determines the health or sickness of the interstitial fluid environment which controls a human destiny and how genetics are expressed or not expressed.
The viral or germ theory assumes the existence of a virus and that a specific virus can penetrate the cell membrane and infect the cell causing a specific disease with specific symptomologies.  The infectious disease theory has NEVER been proven using the scientific method (Koch’s Postulates) let alone the existence of the virus from Polio to HIV to SARS to Ebola to Zika to COVID-19.  It is ALL fake science! Using a vaccine to push toxic biologicals and poisonous chemicals into the vascular system will immediately be eliminated into the compartments of the interstitial fluids of the Interstitium to be eliminated via the lymphatic system.  If not eliminated these toxic biological genetic fragments from animal and human sources and chemical poisons contained in ALL vaccines will be deposited and stored in the compartments of the Interstitum and eventually deposited into the connective and fatty tissues if not properly eliminated through the 4 or 5 orfices of the human body via defecation, urination, perspiration, respiration and menstruation for women.
Sick people and especially sick and old people will always be negatively effected by the influenza and any new COVID-19 vaccines. A chemical or biological poison injected into the intravascular fluids will cause an immediate immune activation, pathological blood coagulation, oxygen deprivation and systemic poisoning or sepsis (50 million people a year Worldwide) and finally death.
• (Jan 24) A daughter, important in the chain of transmission of a family, was interpreted as a false negative. Alternatively it could have been concluded that this woman did not have the coronavirus, but that would have badly damaged the family transmission story, and left open other reasons for the cluster of illnesses (and CT scan abnormalities).[3]
• (Jan 24) A grandson tested positive without any symptoms at all, except lung abnormalities on a CT scan. This allowed them to declare him as ill (asymptomatic pneumonia). But he could have been an asymptomatic case or a false positive.  [3]
• (Jan 29) Out of 206 Japanese evacuated from Wuhan, only three tested positive, and two were found to have “no symptoms”. Instead of considering them false positives, they are considered infected and possibly infectious.[12]
• (Jan 30) Four Germans [9] could be seen as showing that the RNA test produces false positives or that the illness produced by the virus is often not severe. But it will be interpreted as neither by dogmatic promoters of the coronavirus theory, it simply will not be mentioned now that the main message, that the virus is infectious, is bolstered by the evidence.
• (Jan 31) A woman who returned from China to her Canadian university with illness, first tested negative, and then positive. This was interpreted as indicating that she had very little virus in her body at the time of the first test, and that the test was not sensitive enough. However, PCR testing is extraordinarily sensitive, and if she had so little virus, how was it that she had symptoms? An alternative explanation is that she became positive on the test in Canada, perhaps because this virus is actually quite common, or because the test is not for a virus, but is just measuring RNA created by the human body in response to disease conditions.[8] • (Feb 2) An 80 year old Hong Kong man tested positive after hospital admission due to a fever, but his only recent trip to mainland China was a brief visit to Shenzhen, just outside Hong Kong (over 1000km from Wuhan by car). He had no contact with other cases, markets with live animals or wild animals. https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1506121-20200202.htm • (Feb 4) Of 6 positive cases in Singapore reported in [14], the first had a sore throat and cough, but no pneumonia, the second and third had undescribed symptoms, and the last three had no symptoms. [44]
• (Feb 22) Two cases in Chiba prefecture, Japan, had no relationship with each other, or any contact with other cases or a relevant travel history. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/japans-new-coronavirus-cases-rise-again-as-doubtsabout-prevention-grow
• (Feb 22) Director-General of WHO says that “cases with no clear epidemiological link, such as travel history to China or contact with a confirmed case” are a concern. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/02/22/808440540/coronavirus-cases-triple-insouth-korea-who-keeps-eye-on-africa-iran • (Feb 27) After a hospital in Vienna, Austria, decided to test everyone with compatible symptoms, a 72-year old man tested positive. He had no known route of infection, had already been in the hospital 10 days, and none of his contacts were ill or infected. https://www.vindobona.org/article/coronavirus-infectedperson-has-been-in-hospital-for-several-days . [45] • (Feb 27) An 88-year old man in San Marino (Duchy within Italy) tested positive, but an investigation showed he had not travelled abroad, nor to the ‘red’ areas of Italy where other cases have been found. https://sanmarinortv.sm/news/comunicati-c9/gruppo-coordinamento-emergenze-sanitarieaggiornamento-del-27-febbraio-2020-a184304 • (Feb 28) An Oregon resident became the first positive case with no known history of travel to affected countries or contact with infected individuals. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/02/28/coronavirus-liveupdates/?p9w22b2p=b2p22p9w00098 • (Feb 28) A dog in Hong Kong whose owner was positive, also tested positive, but scientists claimed that perhaps the dog was not infected but had just inhaled or ingested virus particles. They did not explain why this could not also occur with humans. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/a-dog-in-hong-kong-testspositive-for-the-coronavirus-who-confirms.html • (Mar 1) Newsweek reported an American man tested negative upon return from Wuhan, China, without any symptoms. But later he was “weakly positive” and was returned to quarantine. https://www.newsweek.com/cdcmistakenly-released-texas-coronavirus-patient-who-later-tested-positive-san-antoniomayor-says-1489939 • (Mar 2) A medical article reported a woman in Guangdong, China who tested positive at the end of an 8 day period of symptoms, had two negative tests after symptoms had resolved (days 12 and 14), but then a positive test (day 17), followed by three more negative tests (days 20, 22, 32). She was asymptomatic this entire time. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220301223 • (Mar 2) El Pais reported that at least five positive cases in Torrejón de Ardoz, near Madrid, had not travelled to any country considered a risk, not had contact with any other patient. https://english.elpais.com/society/2020-03-02/healthexperts-concerned-over-unexplained-coronavirus-cases-in-spain.html • (Mar 6) British Columbia, Canada reports a positive case with no recent travel history and no known contact with another patient. https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/3073841/coronavirus-britishcolumbia-announces-canadas • (Mar 12) A woman returned from Italy to Cuba, where her husband was, and developed minor respiratory symptoms after her return [27]. Her symptoms resolved, but a few days later the husband developed symptoms, and both went to a hospital, where they were put in isolation. When they were tested, the husband, who had not been outside the country, was positive, but the wife was negative. The medical institute hypothesized that she had become negative in the 15 days after her first symptoms, but there was no evidence that she had ever been positive. [46]