Dr. Robert O. Young – “The virus a concept that only exists on a piece of paper”
A Second Thought About Viruses, Vaccines and the Viral Hypothesis
Three articles published in the International Journal of Viruses and Vaccines
Second Thoughts about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/ AIDS Hypothesis – Part 1
Robert O Young – Universal Medical Imaging Group, USA Correspondence: Robert O Young, pH Miracle Inc., 16390 Dia del Sol, Valley Center, California, 92082, USA, Tel 760 751 8321
Received: January 01, 2016 | Published: June 20, 2016
Citation: Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis – Part 1. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00032. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00032
Vaccines; Vaccination; Virus; HIV; AIDS; Ebola; Hunta virus; Hepatitis C; Pleomorphism; Yeast; Candida albicans; Koch’s postulate; Farr’s law; Virology; Louis Pasteur; Antione BeChamp; Microzyma
“In the sciences, people quickly come to regard as their own personal property that which they have learned and had passed on to them at the universities and academies. If however, someone else now comes along with new ideas that contradict the Credo (that has been recited for years and passed on in turn to others) and in fact even threaten to overturn it, then all passions are raised against this threat and no method is left untried to suppress it. People resist it in every way possible: pretending not to have heard about it; speaking disparagingly of it, as if it were not even worth the effort of looking into the matter. And so a new truth can have a long wait before finally being accepted.”-Goethe
The first isolation of a virus was achieved in 1892 by Russian bacteria hunter Dimitri Iwanowski, who gathered fluid from diseased tobacco plants. He passed this liquid through a filter fine enough to retain bacteria; yet to Iwanowski’s surprise, the bacteria-free filtrate easily made healthy plants sick. In 1898 a Dutch botanist, Martinus Willem Beijerinck, repeating the experiment, also recognized that there was an invisible cause and named the infectious agent “tobacco mosaic virus.” In the same year as Beijerinck’s report, two German scientists purified a liquid containing filterable viruses that caused foot-and-mouth disease in cattle (viruses were at one time called “filterable viruses,” but eventually the term “filterable” came to apply only to viruses, and was dropped). Walter Reed followed in 1901 with a filtrate responsible for yellow fever, and soon dozens of other disease-causing viruses were found.
In 1935 another American, Wendell M. Stanley, went back to the beginning and created pure crystals of tobacco mosaic virus from a filtered liquid solution. He affirmed that these crystals could easily infect plants, and concluded that a virus was not a living organism, since it could be crystallized like salt and yet remain infectious. Subsequently, bacteriologists all over the world began filtering for viruses, and a new area of biology was born-virology.
Historically, medical science has vacillated on the question of whether a virus is alive. Originally it was described as nonliving, but is currently said to be an extremely complex molecule or an extremely simple microorganism, and is usually referred to as a parasite having a cycle of life. (The term “killed” is applied to certain viral vaccines, thus implying an official conviction that viruses live.) Commonly composed of either DNA or RNA cores with protein coverings, and having no inherent reproductive ability, viruses depend upon the host for replication. They must utilize the nucleic acids of living cells they infect to reproduce their proteins (i.e., trick the host into producing them), which are then assembled into new viruses like cars on an assembly line. Theoretically, this is their only means of surviving and infecting new cells or hosts.
Birth of Virology – A Miscarriage?
Underlying the birth of virology was the doctrine of monomorphism-that all microorganisms (herein called microforms) are fixed species, unchangeable; that each pathological type produces (usually) only one specific disease; that microforms never arise endogenously, i.e., have absolute origin within the host; and that blood and tissues are sterile under healthy conditions. This last point warrants immediate comment.
In the early third of the 20th century, the heated debate took place over filterable bacteria versus non-filterable. This was a major battle concerning micromorphology (discussed briefly below). The orthodox view prevailed: bacterial forms were not small enough to pass, or did not have a smaller, earlier stage. What passed through “bacteria-proof filters was something else, i.e., viruses. Standard medical textbooks long made this fettering distinction between bacteria and viruses. Subsequently, however, the cellular nature of many filterable forms originally thought to be viruses, such as some mycoplasmas, rickettsias, and various other groups, has been established. In this writer’s opinion, with the victory of the monomorphic view, deeper understanding of infectious “disease” was lost, setting the stage for cancer, degenerative symptoms and AIDS.
Read the entire article by clicking of this link: https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/second-thoughts-about-viruses-vaccines-and-the-hiv-aids-hypothesis—part-1.html
Second Thoughts Concerning Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis – Part 2
Robert O Young Universal Medical Imaging Group, USA Correspondence: Robert O Young, pH Miracle Inc., 16390 Dia del Sol, Valley Center, California, 92082, USA, Tel 760 751 8321 Received: January 01, 2016 | Published: June 29, 2016
Citation: Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts Concerning Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis – Part 2. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00034. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00034 Download PDF
“In the sciences, people quickly come to regard as their own personal property that which they have learned and had passed on to them at the universities and academies. If however, someone else now comes along with new ideas that contradict the Credo (that has been recited for years and passed on in turn to others) and in fact even threaten to overturn it, then all passions are raised against this threat and no method is left untried to suppress it. People resist it in every way possible: pretending not to have heard about it; speaking disparagingly of it, as if it were not even worth the effort of looking into the matter. And so a new truth can have a long wait before finally being accepted.”-Goethe
Read the entire article by clicking on this link: https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/second-thoughts-concerning-viruses-vaccines-and-the-hivaids-hypothesis—part-2.html
Second Thoughts Concerning Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis – Part 3 HIV/AIDS and the Monomorphic Disease Model
Robert O Young Universal Medical Imaging Group, USA Correspondence: Robert O Young, pH Miracle Inc., 16390 Dia del Sol, Valley Center, California, 92082, USA, Tel 760 751 8321 Received: January 01, 2016 | Published: July 8, 2016
Citation: Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts Concerning Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis – Part 3 HIV/AIDS and the Monomorphic Disease Model. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00035. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00035
Read the entire article by clicking on this link: https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/second-thoughts-concerning-viruses-vaccines-and-the-hivaids-hypothesis—part-3-hivaids-and-the-monomorphic-disease-model.html
“Rationality ex post facto.—Whatever lives long is gradually so saturated with reason that its irrational origins become improbable. Does not almost every accurate history of the origin of something sound paradoxical and sacrilegious to our feelings? Doesn’t the good historian contradict all the time?” Friedrich Nietzsche (The Dawn of Day, first book, aphorism
A decisive thesis of “Virus Mania” is that there is no evidence that the particles that have been given names like HIV, H5N1 or SARS-CoV-2 are disease-causing viruses—and that these particles may very well be of non-viral origin. One central reason for this is that the particles claimed to be viruses have not been purified in the relevant studies. However, such “purification” is an indispensable prerequisite for detecting viruses and creating valid antibody and PCR tests based on them.
This is also stated by scientists who are the most renowned in the world, among them:
What is the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus?
What is the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus is outlined on the website of Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD .
Experts Stating that There Is No Proof that the Particles Named SARS-CoV-2 Belong to a Disease-Causing Virus
Biophysicist and head of the Australian Perth Group ; the world’s first expert to understand the trouble with (missing) viral isolation/purification and to show unequivocally that HIV has never been detected
Forensic psychiatrist; with a BSc from M.I.T. in molecular biology
Emergency physician and member of the Perth Group
Prof. Dr. Ivo Juránek, PhD DSc
Advocate of the High Court of South Africa and former district- and regional court magistrate; national chairman of the Treatment Information Group
Member of the executive board of the Czech organization RESETHEUS (Return to Essential Scientific Ethos and Transparency)
Professor of industrial production of bio-drugs at the University of L’Aquila (Italy)
University Technology Tutor in the UK; operator of the site Investigatin the Alleged COVID-19 Pandemic
Physician, Kinesiologist – Functional Movement Specialist & Master Gardener; MSc in Social Psychology (Utah State University)Dr. Stefan LankaMolecular Biologist
Founding president of the Weston A. Price Foundation
Argrarian biotechnologist and graduate of the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine.
Robert O. Young, MSc DSc PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner
Dr. Urmie Ray, BA, MA, Mmath, PhD Cantab
Sociologist, collaborates with the Czech organization RESETHEUS (Return to Essential Scientific Ethos and Transparency)
Health mindset coach and chiropractor ( drmelissasell.com )
Urologist, Paris Healhtcare Group
Dr. Dolores Cahill Reid Sheftall, MD
Holistic wellness coaches and educators for the Bigelsen Academy
Dr. Ben Tapper Torsten Knackstedt
CEO of Western Medical Assessments; he has been the Company’s Medical Director for over 20 years.
He was a student of Natural Hygiene since he was 18 (at the beginning of 2021 he was 70); he earned a degree in naturopathy, spinology and acupuncture; he worked with raw food pioneer T.C. Fry for a short while.